The Latest From Larry


 

North Star Writers Group
November 24, 2008

Economic Woes or Not, We’re Running Out of Time to Stop a Nuclear Iran 
By Lawrence J. Haas

Hopes that Iran’s passage of key thresholds in its nuclear program will prompt a serious global response continue to go unanswered: The International Atomic Energy Agency reported recently that Tehran has enriched enough uranium for one nuclear bomb – and the world yawned.

While, from Washington to Brussels to Beijing, the world is understandably focused on a financial meltdown that could morph into the deepest recession in decades, Tehran moves ever closer to what President-elect Barack Obama has termed the "game-changer" of nuclear weaponry.

Time is running short to stop Tehran through the "tough diplomacy" that Obama promises, the existing multi-national sanctions that are not hurting Iran’s economy enough to force its leaders to rethink their strategy, or a more robust approach that actually could work.

That robust approach would include restricting Iran’s import of refined petroleum on which its economy depends, freezing the overseas assets of its leaders, providing covert support for democratic reformers who face severe governmental repression and building ties to Iran’s restless population that largely hates the regime and already looks favorably on the United States.

Whether the United States and its allies divert their attention quickly enough, and long enough, from the economic chaos to adopt a plan to derail Iran’s nuclear ambitions will depend on how seriously they take the threat. Here are three reasons they should do so.

1) The radical regime in Tehran may well actually use nuclear weapons once it has them.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has his own power base but also enjoys the support of Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, continues threatening to obliterate Israel, our closest ally in the region, which he calls a "stain of disgrace" and a "stinking corpse." He and other Iranian leaders promise and predict Israel’s coming demise.

Iran’s nuclear program extends far beyond enrichment, making the threat to Israel ever more real. Tehran is investing heavily in long-range and technologically advanced missiles that could blanket the Jewish State as well as the know-how to mount nuclear warheads on them.

Furthermore, Iran’s nuclear program directly threatens not just U.S. allies but the United States itself. Ahmadinejad waxes about a "world without America" that is "achievable," chants of "death to America" arise in Iran’s parliament and at officially sanctioned speeches across the land, and Iran’s leaders seem to believe that nuclear weaponry is their tool to reach that goal.

Specifically, Iran is testing the technology to launch what’s known as an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack, detonating a nuclear weapon in the skies above the United States and shutting down the electricity grid on which we depend for virtually all necessities and conveniences.

Across the land, lights would go out, computers would crash and food would rot. The nation would revert to a 19th Century existence, millions would die of starvation and illness and recovery from this devastating attack would take weeks, months – perhaps even years.

2) With nuclear weaponry in hand, Iran would gain huge leverage to advance its regional ambitions.

The United States and others would have to think twice – at the very least – before mounting pressure against Tehran in response to its aggressive and de-stabilizing activities.

Iran is plenty dangerous to begin with. It is the world’s most active state sponsor of terrorism, and its terrorist clients Hezbollah and Hamas are re-arming themselves on Israel’s border in Lebanon and Gaza, respectively. Hezbollah and Iran also have each built a strong presence in South America, the latter with the help of Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez.

Tehran supplied Shiite militias in Iraq with dangerous weapons to use against U.S. forces, it has sought to destabilize the emerging Iraqi state and it tried (albeit unsuccessfully) to derail the new U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement. Considering the scale of Iran’s activities across the region, a nuclear-armed Tehran is almost too frightening to contemplate.

3) Iran’s development of nuclear weapons will essentially destroy the last remnants of the world’s non-proliferation efforts.

Already, at least 10 nations in the region, including Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, have announced plans to launch nuclear energy programs. They profess to want nuclear energy for peaceful purposes but, in fact, they clearly seek nuclear weapons to counteract those of Iran.

A world with more nuclear-armed nations is a more dangerous world. That those additional nations are located in and around the volatile Middle East makes our potential future that much scarier.

So, yes, the world’s leaders must revive the global economy. But they also must adopt a plan that will prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

They are running out of time to do so.

© 2008 North Star Writers Group. May not be republished without permission

 












replace with your keywords

 

Most Recent Writings

North Star Writers Group
November 17, 2008

Obama: Make Us Feel Better
North Star Writers Group
November 11, 2008

The Unfortunate Allure of Cheaper Gas
North Star Writers Group
November 10, 2008

Four Crucial Tests Await Obama
North Star Writers Group
November 3, 2008

Tempelhof, a True Story for Our Time
North Star Writers Group
October 27, 2008

What the President-Elect Should Say (But Probably Won’t)
North Star Writers Group
October 20, 2008

Truman’s Tenure Provides Hope, and Caution, About Obama
North Star Writers Group
October 13, 2008

Presuming They Win, Democrats Must Not Overreach
Media
Fall
2008

From the new book, Getting It Done: A Guide for Government Executives
InFocus
Fall
2008

A League of Democracies Would Serve America Well

DEMOCRATIYA
Autumn
2008

Letter from Washington/Searching for Barack

Sacramento Bee
August 14,
2008

Obama should follow Bush’s successful Latin policies

Columbus Dispatch
July 7,
2008

Should U.S. promote a League of Democracies as U.N. alternative?

Yes: America's ideals and security would be enhanced by like-minded members

Democratiya
Summer 2008

Letter from Washington / A Shallow State of War:

Reflections From An Un-Serious Nation

Sacramento Bee
May 8, 2008

Carter's kow-towing to terrorists blocks path to peace
Washington Examiner
April 17, 2008
Democrats should ratify Colombia trade deal
San Diego Union-Tribune
April 11, 2008
IS HUGO CHÁVEZ A THREAT
TO STABILITY OF LATIN AMERICA?
Sacramento Bee
February 28, 2008
Timing could not be worse for peace mission
Sacramento Bee
January 18, 2008
Is Russia’s Vladimir Putin intent on launching a new Cold War?
Yes: Putin's rhetoric sounds jarringly like Khrushchev’s
Democratiya 11
Winter 2007

Democrats could blow 2008 over national security
TESTIMONY OF
LAWRENCE J. HAAS
TO THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM

November 07, 2007

“IRAN: REALITY, OPTIONS, AND CONSEQUENCES. PART 2 – NEGOTIATING WITH THE IRANIANS: MISSED OPPORTUNITIES AND PATHS FORWARD”
The Washington Examiner
October 29, 2007
Time for a new “coalition of the willing” against Iran
The Washington Examiner
October 15, 2007
Raise taxes to strengthen national security
The Washington Examiner
October 1, 2007
Democratic excesses on Iraq put 2008 at risk
Atlantic City Press
September 7, 2007
Americans must be the eyes and ears of homeland security  
San Diego Union-Tribune
July 31, 2007
Why demonize Iraq war contractors?

inFocus

Summer 2007

The World According to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Miami Herald
June 25, 2007

Deal improves U.S. economy, security
Bergen Record
June 3, 2007

Nation of police? It's very crucial
Daily Herald (Utah)
May 10, 2007

Congress should bar terror supporters from its premises
Journal of
International Security Affairs
Spring 2007
The Democratic Moment?
Fort Worth Star Telegram
February 26, 2007

Would A Nuclear-Armed Iran Use Its Weapons?
Dealing with a death culture
The Washington Examiner
February 15, 2007

Democrats should beware the post-Vietnam syndrome
Fresno Bee
January 14, 2007
Israel shouldn't have to negotiate with a terror group seeking its annihilation
Baltimore Sun
December 11, 2006
A bipartisan tax-code fix
Duluth News Tribune
November 25, 2006
U.S. would harm freedom by talking with sponsors of terror
Springfield (MO) News-Leader
November 12, 2006
Quick withdrawal would be bad foreign policy move
Salt Lake Tribune
October 20, 2006
Iran still poses biggest threat to U.S.
The Monterey Herald
October 8, 2006
Just another thug bashing the U.S. president
San Diego Union-Tribune
September 8, 2006
SEPT. 11 FIVE YEARS LATER: IS AMERICA SAFER?
Yes. America is killing its enemies on their home turfs
Sacramento Bee
August 29, 2006
Global community's tepid diplomacy
San Diego Union-Tribune August 10, 2006
Myths block Middle East peace hopes
Houston Chronicle July 22, 2006
A Ned Lamont victory would jeopardize a safe
Democratic seat and undermine party unity
Washington Examiner July 21, 2006
Mideast war highlights dangers of a nuclear Iran
New Haven Register June 18, 2006
Challenge to Lieberman could hurt all Democrats
Miami Herald June 12, 2006
A Nuclear Iran is America’s Worst Nightmare
Washington Examiner May 25, 2006
West must stop appeasing, start pressuring Iran
Roll Call March 6, 2006
Fiscal Hawks Should Pray for a Crisis
San Diego Union-Tribune March 3, 2006
'Is the mainstream media encouraging a sense of defeatism by concentrating on the negatives in covering Iraq?'
Yes. One-sided coverage of war creates cynicism
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel January 22, 2006
West must wake up to possibility that Iran's saber-rattling is real