The Latest From Larry


 

Sacramento Bee
August 14, 2008

Obama should follow Bush’s successful Latin policies
By Lawrence J. Haas

U.S. foreign policy is about more than confronting immediate dangers. It’s also about promoting American values of freedom, democracy and human rights over the long term because we believe those values create the path for more peace and prosperity – not just at home but around the world.

Though freedom and democracy have spread to more nations than ever in recent decades, further progress is not guaranteed. From Russia to China and throughout the Middle East, authoritarian regimes are digging in, determined to resist efforts to topple their iron rule.

The clash between democratic and authoritarian models is particularly intense in Latin America, where U.S. allies are facing a small cabal of populist leaders, led by Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez. These modern caudillos are seeking to turn back the clock on regional democratic progress – promoting greater state control of the economy and less respect for human rights.

With the lines drawn starkly, President Bush has gotten it mostly right in our own hemisphere. He has sought to build stronger ties with our friends, notably Colombia, and to contain the ambitions of our adversaries. Rather than shift course, the next president and Congress should reinforce those efforts

Bush has strongly supported Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, who has worked hard to bring stability and prosperity to his once-troubled land while stepping up the fight against the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, the terror group that’s better known as FARC

The results have been dramatic. Economic growth and living standards are way up, while drug trafficking, kidnappings, and murders of labor leaders are way down. Bogota is applying the rule of law to a once-lawless land, prosecuting murderers and protecting human rights

Colombia’s recent rescue of former presidential candidate Ingrid Betancourt and more than a dozen others merely highlighted what was already clear – Uribe has FARC on the run. Half of its leadership is dead, and its ranks have shrunk from more than 25,000 to fewer than 8,000.

FARC has been supported – financially and otherwise – by Chavez, who promotes anti-Americanism, works with like-minded leaders in Bolivia and Ecuador, boasts of his growing ties to the terror-sponsoring and nuclear weapons-seeking Iranian regime, and threatens to use his oil as a weapon against the United States.

Colombia’s gain is our gain – it shows hundreds of millions of people south of our border that freedom, democracy, and the rule of law help improve living standards. FARC’s loss is our gain as well – it weakens Chavez while showing that a free society can break the back of a terrorist threat.

Thus, the United States has no reason to change course in Latin America. Quite the contrary, we should strengthen our ties to Bogota, and strengthen Uribe at home, by enacting the long-delayed U.S.-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement, which Democratic congressional leaders have blocked largely due to the opposition of organized labor.

If Barack Obama wins the presidency, foreign leaders and populations the world over will quickly look for clues as to whether this young, charismatic, but inexperienced and untested leader will stick by America’s friends while remaining steadfast against its enemies.

In the late 1970s, an equally inexperienced new president chose a different route. President Carter downplayed the Soviet threat, abandoned our allies in Iran and Nicaragua, and sought warm ties to new regimes with a particularly virulent anti-American bent.

The results were disastrous. The Soviet Union and Cuba stoked Third World revolution across Africa, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, and Iranian students seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran and held our diplomats hostage for 444 days. Through it all, the United States looked weak and uncertain.

We need not repeat that history. A President Obama would be wise not to abandon a policy that’s bearing fruit.

Lawrence J. Haas is vice president of the Committee on the Present Danger.

 

 












replace with your keywords

 

Most Recent Writings

Columbus Dispatch
July 7,
2008

Should U.S. promote a League of Democracies as U.N. alternative?
Yes: America's ideals and security would be enhanced by like-minded members

Democratiya
Summer 2008

Letter from Washington / A Shallow State of War:

Reflections From An Un-Serious Nation

Sacramento Bee
May 8, 2008

Carter's kow-towing to terrorists blocks path to peace
Washington Examiner
April 17, 2008
Democrats should ratify Colombia trade deal
San Diego Union-Tribune
April 11, 2008
IS HUGO CHÁVEZ A THREAT
TO STABILITY OF LATIN AMERICA?
Sacramento Bee
February 28, 2008
Timing could not be worse for peace mission
Sacramento Bee
January 18, 2008
Is Russia’s Vladimir Putin intent on launching a new Cold War?
Yes: Putin's rhetoric sounds jarringly like Khrushchev’s
Democratiya 11
Winter 2007

Democrats could blow 2008 over national security
TESTIMONY OF
LAWRENCE J. HAAS
TO THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON
OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM

November 07, 2007

“IRAN: REALITY, OPTIONS, AND CONSEQUENCES. PART 2 – NEGOTIATING WITH THE IRANIANS: MISSED OPPORTUNITIES AND PATHS FORWARD”
The Washington Examiner
October 29, 2007
Time for a new “coalition of the willing” against Iran
The Washington Examiner
October 15, 2007
Raise taxes to strengthen national security
The Washington Examiner
October 1, 2007
Democratic excesses on Iraq put 2008 at risk
Atlantic City Press
September 7, 2007
Americans must be the eyes and ears of homeland security  
San Diego Union-Tribune
July 31, 2007
Why demonize Iraq war contractors?

inFocus

Summer 2007

The World According to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad
Miami Herald
June 25 2007

Deal improves U.S. economy, security
Bergen Record
June 3 2007

Nation of police? It's very crucial
Daily Herald (Utah)
May 10 2007

Congress should bar terror supporters from its premises
Journal of
International Security Affairs
Spring 2007
The Democratic Moment?
Fort Worth Star Telegram
February 26, 2007

Would A Nuclear-Armed Iran Use Its Weapons?
Dealing with a death culture
The Washington Examiner
February 15, 2007

Democrats should beware the post-Vietnam syndrome
Fresno Bee
January 14, 2007
Israel shouldn't have to negotiate with a terror group seeking its annihilation
Baltimore Sun
December 11, 2006
A bipartisan tax-code fix
Duluth News Tribune
November 25, 2006
U.S. would harm freedom by talking with sponsors of terror
Springfield (MO) News-Leader
November 12, 2006
Quick withdrawal would be bad foreign policy move
Salt Lake Tribune
October 20, 2006
Iran still poses biggest threat to U.S.
The Monterey Herald
October 8, 2006
Just another thug bashing the U.S. president
San Diego Union-Tribune
September 8, 2006
SEPT. 11 FIVE YEARS LATER: IS AMERICA SAFER?
Yes. America is killing its enemies on their home turfs
Sacramento Bee
August 29, 2006
Global community's tepid diplomacy
San Diego Union-Tribune August 10, 2006
Myths block Middle East peace hopes
Houston Chronicle July 22, 2006
A Ned Lamont victory would jeopardize a safe
Democratic seat and undermine party unity
Washington Examiner July 21, 2006
Mideast war highlights dangers of a nuclear Iran
New Haven Register June 18, 2006
Challenge to Lieberman could hurt all Democrats
Miami Herald June 12, 2006
A Nuclear Iran is America’s Worst Nightmare
Washington Examiner May 25, 2006
West must stop appeasing, start pressuring Iran
Roll Call March 6, 2006
Fiscal Hawks Should Pray for a Crisis
San Diego Union-Tribune March 3, 2006
'Is the mainstream media encouraging a sense of defeatism by concentrating on the negatives in covering Iraq?'
Yes. One-sided coverage of war creates cynicism
Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel January 22, 2006
West must wake up to possibility that Iran's saber-rattling is real